{"filing":{"accession_number":"0001140361-26-025335","cik":"0001386278","ticker":"GDOT","company_name":"GREEN DOT CORP","form":"8-K","filing_date":"2026-06-16","report_date":null,"primary_document":"ef20076171_8k.htm","primary_document_url":"https://www.sec.gov/Archives/edgar/data/1386278/000114036126025335/ef20076171_8k.htm"},"events":[{"id":11226,"run_id":9845,"accession_number":"0001140361-26-025335","anchor_item_number":"8.01","event_type":"material_litigation","event_domain":"legal","is_material":true,"confidence":0.92,"summary":"The filing discloses three lawsuits challenging the proposed merger transaction filed in New York Supreme Court (Phillips v. Green Dot, Richardson v. Green Dot, and Zaccagnino v. Brewster), plus demand letters from purported stockholders alleging disclosure deficiencies in the proxy statement/prospectus. Although the company denies merit and made supplemental disclosures to mitigate litigation risk, the existence of multiple shareholder class-action-style challenges to a material M\u0026A transaction constitutes material litigation that would affect a reasonable investor's assessment of transaction risk and timing.","company_name":"GREEN DOT CORP","ticker":"GDOT","filing_date":"2026-06-16","form":"8-K","submitted_at":null,"items":[{"id":7764,"accession_number":"0001140361-26-025335","item_number":"8.01","item_title":"Other Events.","event_type":"material_litigation","event_domain":"legal","is_material":true,"confidence":0.92,"reasoning":"The filing discloses three lawsuits challenging the proposed merger transaction filed in New York Supreme Court (Phillips v. Green Dot, Richardson v. Green Dot, and Zaccagnino v. Brewster), plus demand letters from purported stockholders alleging disclosure deficiencies in the proxy statement/prospectus. Although the company denies merit and made supplemental disclosures to mitigate litigation risk, the existence of multiple shareholder class-action-style challenges to a material M\u0026A transaction constitutes material litigation that would affect a reasonable investor's assessment of transaction risk and timing.","classifier_version":"claude-haiku-4-5-20251001+prompt-9e0ffca5","taxonomy_version":"v1","classified_at":"2026-06-16T12:40:06.988583+00:00","company_name":"","ticker":null,"filing_date":""}]}],"classifications":[{"id":7764,"accession_number":"0001140361-26-025335","item_number":"8.01","item_title":"Other Events.","event_type":"material_litigation","event_domain":"legal","is_material":true,"confidence":0.92,"reasoning":"The filing discloses three lawsuits challenging the proposed merger transaction filed in New York Supreme Court (Phillips v. Green Dot, Richardson v. Green Dot, and Zaccagnino v. Brewster), plus demand letters from purported stockholders alleging disclosure deficiencies in the proxy statement/prospectus. Although the company denies merit and made supplemental disclosures to mitigate litigation risk, the existence of multiple shareholder class-action-style challenges to a material M\u0026A transaction constitutes material litigation that would affect a reasonable investor's assessment of transaction risk and timing.","classifier_version":"claude-haiku-4-5-20251001+prompt-9e0ffca5","taxonomy_version":"v1","classified_at":"2026-06-16T12:40:06.988583+00:00","company_name":"GREEN DOT CORP","ticker":"GDOT","filing_date":"2026-06-16"}]}