Fiscal period ending 2025-09-30 versus 2024-09-30
— view filing on EDGAR →
Trade, climate, and regulatory risks all moved in the same direction, with each shifting from abstract or contingent to concrete and near-term. The most consequential escalation is the SEC's abandonment of its defense of climate disclosure rules, which converts a stayed regulatory overhang into a probable compliance burden. Simultaneously, tariff exposure is now framed as an imminent policy threat rather than a hypothetical, and rising insurance costs tied to severe weather are newly quantified as a direct homeownership cost risk.
1 company-specific
· 2 common-mode
Company-specific changes
Revised
Added specific disclosure of rising insurance costs due to severe weather/natural disasters and regional coverage limitations, escalating climate-related homeownership cost risk.
Increases in the costs of owning a home could prevent potential customers from buying our homes and adversely affect our business and financial results. Significant expenses of owning a home…
Also disclosed — common-mode (Tariffs trade policy, ESG regulatory divergence)
Tariffs trade policy
Revised
Tariff language shifted from generic to specific current administration threat, escalating trade risk from hypothetical to imminent policy concern.
Supply shortages and other risks related to acquiring land, building materials and skilled labor and obtaining regulatory approvals could increase our costs and delay deliveries. The homebuilding and…
ESG regulatory divergence
Revised
SEC terminated defense of climate disclosure rules in March 2025, escalating regulatory risk. Prior year stated rules were "stayed"; now company signals heightened likelihood of effectiveness and compliance burden.
Governmental regulations and environmental matters could increase the cost and limit the availability of our land development and housing projects and adversely affect our business and financial…